This week we learn about Kohlberg’s 6 stages of moral develo…

Kohlberg’s six stages of moral development is a well-known theoretical framework in the field of psychology. Developed by Lawrence Kohlberg in the 1950s and 1960s, this theory seeks to explain how individuals develop their moral reasoning abilities throughout their lifespan. Kohlberg proposed that moral development occurs in six distinct stages, with each stage representing a higher level of moral reasoning than the previous one.

Before delving into the stages, it is important to understand a key concept underlying Kohlberg’s theory: moral dilemmas. Moral dilemmas are hypothetical scenarios that present individuals with conflicting moral choices. These dilemmas are designed to test an individual’s moral reasoning abilities by examining their thought process and the factors that influence their decision-making.

The first stage of Kohlberg’s theory is known as the pre-conventional stage. This stage is further divided into two sub-stages: the punishment and obedience orientation and the instrumental relativist orientation. In the punishment and obedience orientation, individuals base their moral decisions on whether an action will lead to punishment or not. They focus on obeying the rules and avoiding negative consequences. In the instrumental relativist orientation, individuals consider their own self-interests when making moral choices. They seek to maximize personal rewards and minimize personal costs.

The second stage is the conventional stage, which is also divided into two sub-stages: the interpersonal concordance orientation and the law and order orientation. In the interpersonal concordance orientation, individuals conform to societal norms and expectations to gain approval from others. They view morality as maintaining social relationships and following the expectations of others. In the law and order orientation, individuals prioritize following the rules and laws of society. They believe that these rules are essential for maintaining social order and upholding justice.

Moving on to the third stage, we have the post-conventional stage. This stage is divided into two sub-stages: the social contract orientation and the universal ethical principle orientation. In the social contract orientation, individuals recognize that rules and laws are social agreements that can be revised and modified. They consider the greater good and the rights of individuals when making moral choices. In the universal ethical principle orientation, individuals develop their own set of ethical principles that guide their moral decisions. They strive to uphold principles like justice, equality, and human rights, even if these principles conflict with societal norms and laws.

It is important to note that not all individuals reach the higher stages of moral development. Some individuals may remain at the pre-conventional or conventional stages throughout their lives. However, Kohlberg’s theory suggests that individuals who reach the post-conventional stages tend to have a more sophisticated understanding of morality and are more likely to make decisions based on ethical principles rather than external rewards or societal norms.

Critics of Kohlberg’s theory have argued that it fails to account for cultural differences and the influence of emotions on moral reasoning. Additionally, some have questioned the universal applicability of the six stages, suggesting that moral development may be influenced by factors other than those proposed by Kohlberg.

In conclusion, Kohlberg’s six stages of moral development provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how individuals develop their moral reasoning abilities. From the pre-conventional stages focused on avoiding punishment and maximizing rewards, to the post-conventional stages guided by ethical principles and the greater good, this theory maps out the progression of moral thinking throughout a person’s life. While not without its criticisms, Kohlberg’s theory remains influential in the field of psychology and contributes to our understanding of moral development.