PAPER DUE FRIDAY NOVEMBER 18, 2016 Purchase the answer…

The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth


Entrepreneurship plays a significant role in driving economic growth, job creation, and innovation in a country. Several studies have highlighted the positive impact of entrepreneurship on the economy, showing that it stimulates productivity, fosters technological advancement, and leads to increased employment opportunities (Audretsch, 2007; Shane, 2009). This paper aims to analyze the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic growth and to provide insights into the mechanisms through which entrepreneurship impacts the economy.

1. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: Theoretical Framework

1.1. Schumpeterian Perspective

The Schumpeterian perspective on entrepreneurship emphasizes the role of innovation and creative destruction in stimulating economic growth. Joseph Schumpeter, an influential economist in the early 20th century, argued that entrepreneurs are the agents of innovation who disrupt existing economic structures through the introduction of new products, technologies, and business models (Schumpeter, 1934). According to Schumpeter, this process of creative destruction is the primary driver of long-term economic growth.

In this view, entrepreneurship is crucial for economic growth as it fosters competition, pushes technological boundaries, and promotes efficiency gains. By introducing new ideas and technologies, entrepreneurs create products that better meet consumer needs and drive market demand. This, in turn, stimulates investment, research and development (R&D), and productivity improvements, leading to overall economic growth (Audretsch, 2007).

1.2. Institutional Perspective

The institutional perspective focuses on the role of the institutional environment in shaping entrepreneurial behavior and its impact on economic growth. Institutions, such as laws, regulations, and social norms, create the overall framework within which entrepreneurs operate (North, 1990). The quality of institutions influences entrepreneurial activity by determining the ease of starting and running a business, protecting property rights, and enforcing contracts.

In countries with well-functioning institutions, entrepreneurship is more likely to flourish, leading to higher levels of economic growth. Conversely, countries with weak institutions face barriers to entrepreneurship, such as corruption, bureaucratic red tape, and lack of legal protection, which hinder new business creation and innovation (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2012).

The institutional perspective also emphasizes the importance of social capital in fostering entrepreneurship and economic growth. Social capital refers to the networks, relationships, and trust among individuals in society (Putnam, 1993). Strong social capital facilitates knowledge transfer, collaboration, and access to resources, promoting entrepreneurship.

Research has shown a positive relationship between social capital and entrepreneurial activity. Countries or regions with higher levels of social capital tend to have more vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystems, characterized by supportive networks, mentorship, and access to funding (Granovetter, 1995). This, in turn, leads to higher levels of economic growth as entrepreneurial ventures generate employment, stimulate local economies, and drive innovation.

1.3. Human Capital Perspective

The human capital perspective argues that entrepreneurship and economic growth are influenced by the knowledge, skills, and experience of individuals. Entrepreneurs who possess higher levels of human capital are more likely to identify and exploit business opportunities, innovate, and create value.

Education is a critical factor in developing human capital, as it equips individuals with the necessary knowledge and skills to navigate the business landscape (Krueger & Brazeal, 1994). Higher education levels have been found to positively correlate with entrepreneurship rates and economic growth (Audretsch & Thurik, 2000). Highly educated entrepreneurs have access to specialized knowledge, research networks, and resources that enable them to develop innovative products and services, leading to economic growth.

Additionally, experience in the form of prior business ownership or industry-specific knowledge is also associated with higher entrepreneurial success rates (Van Praag & Versloot, 2007). Experienced entrepreneurs possess industry insights, networks, and expertise that contribute to the success of their ventures, thus fostering economic growth.

In summary, the theoretical frameworks discussed above highlight the multi-dimensional nature of the relationship between entrepreneurship and economic growth. Entrepreneurship stimulates economic growth by driving technological innovation, fostering competition, and improving productivity. Additionally, institutions and social capital shape the entrepreneurial environment, influencing the feasibility and effectiveness of entrepreneurial activities. Lastly, human capital, in terms of education and experience, plays a crucial role in fostering entrepreneurial success and contributing to economic growth.

2. Mechanisms Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth

2.1. Job Creation

One of the key channels through which entrepreneurship impacts economic growth is job creation. Start-up firms and small businesses are known to be major contributors to employment generation. When entrepreneurs establish new ventures, they create job opportunities for both skilled and unskilled workers.

A study by Haltiwanger, Jarmin, and Miranda (2013) found that young firms, comprising mainly start-ups and small businesses, accounted for a substantial portion of net employment growth in the United States between 1980 and 2010. By providing jobs, entrepreneurship reduces unemployment rates and stimulates economic activity.

Moreover, entrepreneurship enhances labor productivity by creating competition among firms. As new firms enter a market, existing businesses face increased pressure to innovate and improve their efficiency in order to remain competitive (Birch, 1987). This results in a more dynamic market, increased output, and improved economic performance.