CJA 353 Week 3 – LT Search and Seizure PowerPoint Presentati…

Title: Search and Seizure: Balancing Civil Liberties and Effective Law Enforcement

Introduction:
The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution safeguards individuals’ rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. This amendment plays a crucial role in maintaining a delicate balance between protecting civil liberties and enabling law enforcement agencies to effectively combat crime. The purpose of this presentation is to provide an in-depth analysis of the principles, application, and impact of search and seizure laws in the United States.

I. Historical Background:
A. Influence of Colonial Era:
1. English Common Law
2. Writs of Assistance
B. Adoption of the Fourth Amendment:
1. Federalist Papers
2. Ratification Debates
C. Early Supreme Court Cases:
1. Boyd v. United States (1886)
2. Weeks v. United States (1914)

II. Fourth Amendment Principles:
A. Prohibition against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures:
1. Reasonableness Standard
2. Exclusionary Rule

B. Warrant Requirement:
1. Probable Cause
2. Particularity

III. Categories of Searches and Seizures:
A. Searches:
1. Consent Searches
2. Stop and Frisk
3. Vehicle Searches
4. Border Searches

B. Seizures:
1. Arrests
2. Terry Stops
3. Drug Testing

IV. Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement:
A. Search Incident to Arrest
B. Plain View Doctrine
C. Exigent Circumstances
D. Consent Searches
E. Automobile Exception

V. Controversial Issues and Court Rulings:
A. Digital Searches and Privacy:
1. Cell Phone Searches (Riley v. California, 2014)
2. Computer Searches (United States v. Jones, 2012)

B. Racial Profiling and Terry Stops:
1. Whren v. United States (1996)
2. Floyd v. City of New York (2013)

C. Use of Force during Search and Seizure:
1. Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
2. Graham v. Connor (1989)

VI. Impact on Law Enforcement:
A. Training and Policy Development:
1. Constitutional Law updates
2. Procedures for obtaining warrants

B. Challenges and Limitations:
1. Civil Liability
2. Dissuading Witnesses

C. Maintaining Public Trust:
1. Transparency and Accountability
2. Community Policing Initiatives

Conclusion:
The search and seizure provisions of the Fourth Amendment are essential for safeguarding individual liberties while ensuring effective law enforcement. Although established centuries ago, these principles continue to evolve and shape the landscape of criminal justice in the United States. It is imperative for law enforcement agencies to understand and adapt to the legal complexities surrounding search and seizure, as these actions have profound implications for civil liberties, public trust, and the overall functioning of the criminal justice system. By staying abreast of court rulings, adhering to strict protocols, and embracing resident-focused initiatives, law enforcement agencies can strike the delicate balance necessary to protect society while preserving individual rights.